Our Favorite Goat

It doesn't matter if it comes from Al Gore's mouth, from Jon Stewart's mouth, or my roommate's: I inevitably get irritated when anyone blames everything on "the Media." The Media is everyone's favorite scapegoat, but I might consider taking their criticism with more than a grain of salt if I knew what they were talking about. I am often on the side of the Media because I am a part of it and I generally believe in its supreme importance, but I don't pretend to faithfully campaign for the goodness of our country's media at all times even when it's doing something wrong. That's my disclaimer.

What is the Media? Are we talking about big newspapers, little newspapers, magazines, celebrity gossip shows, Cosmopolitan, The O'Reilly Factor, News at 6, NPR, ABC, FOX, the Onion? I think half the time when people are blaming all of the country's problems first on Bush, and second on the Media, they don't have a clear idea of who they're talking about. Al Gore included (during his Thursday appearance on The Daily Show, which was the trigger of my post). He made a lot of good points and Jon Stewart was generally hilarious as usual, but Gore was talking a lot about the Media and he lost me at the capital M. Which Media? After listening to him berate newscasters mostly, I was able to conclude -- if not shakily -- that he was talking about TV news. I think.

I try to stay away from TV news, besides the occasional 60 Minutes, mostly because I agree with Gore. It is very focused on entertainment. The teasers make the stories seem more interesting and important than they actually are, and when it comes down to it the short short stories don't actually say anything. TV news doesn't have the time or the interest to report on Iraq or Israel everyday, so they focus on the local, on the zany, or the different. Generally the stuff that doesn't matter. So it's the entertainment value over the actual investigation, money over matter. But would anyone watch it if it was meaningful? Would any of the approximate 50 percent of Americans watch the news "regularly" if was about exposing politicians rather than Paris Hilton? How heavy do people really want the subject matter when they get home from a long day at work? And really, there are only so many watchdogtype pieces that can come up at any given time. Maybe it's not that TV news is in league with the government and the capitalist economy, as Gore suggested, but that they don't think that anyone really cares. They probably don't. Apathetic, I think, is the word i'm looking for.

Don't newspapers do all that? Newspapers have the same annoying headlines, leads and nuts trying to get people to read it, they also have issues of ownership and advertising income, but they also have more meat. It would take a newscaster 30 minutes to read the feature I wrote earlier this year, but in print people can read it, look at the picture of the penis drawn into the grass, and take from it what interests them. Newspapers have broken some brilliant stories in the past few years, and many many journalists have been jailed and tried for not revealing their sources. Isn't that evidence enough that some reporters, at least, are trying?

Maybe the invasion of the Internet is just what we need. Newspapers (and local news stations) are focusing more and more on the local local issues, the things the people who actually read the papers care about. The local scandals, the local heroes. There are countless places the public can read about Iraq, there's only one place they can read about the city council meeting. That's the trend, anyway.

Either way, people are going to blame the Media. I don't know what, exactly, the Media is, but it's the cause of all the problems in the world.